| S.no | 
 Permanent Mold Casting 
 | 
|
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Permanent mold casting molds are less costly. | Die casting dies are costly. | 
| 2 | It requires more floor area compared to die casting. | It requires less floor area compared to permanent mold casting. | 
| 3 | It gives good surface finishing. | It gives very fine surface finishing. | 
| 4 | It doesn’t require skilled labour in the maintenance of mold casting. | It requires skilled labour for the maintenance of die casting. | 
| 5 | It has high-dimensional accuracies. | It has very high dimensional accuracies. | 
| 6 | This is suitable for small to medium-sized non-ferrous. | There is a limited scope for non-ferrous alloys, and they are used for small-sized castings. | 
| 7 | Production rate is good. | Production rate is very high. | 
| 8 | The initial cost is high, hence it is used for large production. | The initial cost is also high; hence, it is used for large-scale production. | 
| 9 | Several defects, such as stress and surface hardness, may be produced due to the surface chilling effect. | This phenomenon may also occur in this case. | 
Comparison between Permanent Mold Casting and Die Casting
A comparison between permanent mold casting and die casting in aspects such as cost, floor area, surface finishing, production rate, and initial cost is listed below in the table form.
Post a Comment
Post a Comment